DISCLAIMER: What you are about to read is going against EVERYTHING you were EVER taught in school and college in history classes. For a reason. You will know why as you continue IF you study ALL the material offered. IF you do NOT, nor wish to spend the time to en-delve in ALL what is offered then please do NOT come back and criticize ANYTHING about ANY of the information unless you have investigated EVERY word and EVERY REFERENCE POINT. If you have not done that then you have NO right to make ONE critical refute of any part of the information being offered. NOTE: I am also asking that if you do not believe that you think that you can calmly and intelligently study the material in a through way so that you may understand it WITHOUT making some sort of twisted out take and controversy of it all, then I suggest that you NOT to start and LEAVE NOW, because this is for an intelligent, intellectual audience who are concerned about the problems that they are noticing going on in our nation, the United States, and are wondering why they are happening.
"The United States is Still A British Colony" by James Montgomery"
An Expose
Your child or grandchild has graduated from school and now they cannot get a job that will allow them to MOVE OUT ON THEIR OWN and start their own family. Well, you may want to introduce them to this low start up cost business. Please listen. For a free one-time consultation about this, please call 302-423-4286 IF you are serious about their future. We will only speak with people who are serious. Go here to learn about this opportunity..
THE UNITED STATES IS STILL A BRITISH COLONY EXTORTING TAXES FOR THE CROWN!
A DOCUMENTARY REVIEW OF CHARTERS AND TREATIES August 17, 1996
An introduction by the "Informer" This is the latest from a man who visits me quite often. He and another man researched my theory that we have never been free from the British Crown. This disc shows the results. I have stated that we will never win in their courts. This shows conclusively why. We have the hard copy of the treaties that are the footnotes. This predates Schroder's material, my research of the 1861 stats by Lincoln that put us under the War Powers confiscation acts, and John Nelson's material. All our material supports that the real Principal, the King of England, still rules this country through the bankers and why we own no property in allodium. This is why it is so important to start OUR courts of God's natural (common) Law and break away from all the crap they have handed us. This is one reason Virginia had a law to hang all lawyers but was somehow, by someone, (the King) set aside to let them operate again. Some good people put in the original 13th amendment so that without the lawyers the King could not continue his strangle hold on us. James shows how that was quashed by the King. I am happy that James' research of six months bears out my theory that most people would not listen to me, that we are still citizen/subjects under the kings of England. My article called "Reality" published in the American Bulletin and the article of mine on the "Atocha case," wherein Florida in 1981 used it's sovereignty under the British crown to try to take away the gold from the wreck found in Florida waters supports this premise. James makes mention of the Law dictionaries being England's Law Dictionary. You will note it lists the reign of all the Kings of England. It never mentions the reign of the Presidents of this country. Ever wonder Why? Get this out to as many people as you can. The Informer. The United States is still a British Colony [Chapter 1 OF 7] The trouble with history is, we weren't there when it took place and it can be changed to fit someone's belief and/or traditions, or it can be taught in the public schools to favor a political agenda, and withhold many facts. I know you have been taught that we won the Revolutionary War and defeated the British, but I can prove to the contrary. I want you to read this paper with an open mind, and allow yourself to be instructed with the following verifiable facts. You be the judge and don't let prior conclusions on your part or incorrect teaching, keep you from the truth. I too was always taught in school and in studying our history books that our freedom came from the Declaration of Independence and was secured by our winning the Revolutionary War. I'm going to discuss a few documents that are included at the end of this paper, in the footnotes. The first document is the first Charter of Virginia in 1606 (footnote #1). In the first paragraph, the king of England granted our fore fathers license to settle and colonize America. The definition for license is as follows. "In Government Regulation. Authority to do some act or carry on some trade or business, in its nature lawful but prohibited by statute, except with the permission of the civil authority or which would otherwise be unlawful." Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1914. Keep in mind those that came to America from England were British subjects. So you can better understand what I'm going to tell you, here are the definitions for subject and citizen. "In monarchical governments, by subject is meant one who owes permanent allegiance to the monarch." Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1914. "Constitutional Law. One that owes allegiance to a sovereign and is governed by his laws. The natives of Great Britain are subjects of the British government. Men in free governments are subjects as well as citizens; as citizens they enjoy rights and franchises; as subjects they are bound to obey the laws. The term is little used, in this sense, in countries enjoying a republican form of government." Swiss Nat. Ins. Co. v. Miller, 267 U.S. 42, 45 S. Ct. 213, 214, 69 L.Ed. 504. Blacks fifth Ed I chose to give the definition for subject first, so you could better understand what definition of citizen is really being used in American law. Below is the definition of citizen from Roman law. "The term citizen was used in Rome to indicate the possession of private civil rights, including those accruing under the Roman family and inheritance law and the Roman contract and propert law. All other subjects were peregrines. But in the beginning of the 3d century the distinction was abolished and all subjects were citizens; 1 sel. Essays in Anglo-Amer. L. H. 578." Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1914. The king was making a commercial venture when he sent his subjects to America, and used his money and resources to do so. I think you would admit the king had a lawful right to receive gain and prosper from his venture. In the Virginia Charter he declares his sovereignty over the land and his subjects and in paragraph 9 he declares the amount of gold, silver and copper he is to receive if any is found by his subjects. There could have just as easily been none, or his subjects could have been killed by the Indians. This is why this was a valid righ of the king (Jure Coronae, "In right of the crown," Black's forth Ed.), the king expended his resources with the risk of total loss. If you'll notice in paragraph 9 the king declares that all his heirs and successors were to also receive the same amount of gold, silver and copper that he claimed with this Charter. The gold that remained in the colonies was also the kings. He provided the remainder as a benefit for his subjects, which amounted to further use of his capital. You will see in this paper that not only is this valid, but it is still in effect today. If you will read the rest of the Virginia Charter you will see that the king declared the right and exercised the power to regulate every aspect of commerce in his new colony. A license had to be granted for travel connected with transfer of goods (commerce) right down to the furniture they sat on. A great deal of the king's declared property was ceded to America in the Treaty of 1783. I want you to stay focused on the money and the commerce which was not ceded to America. This brings us to the Declaration of Independence. Our freedom was declared because the king did not fulfill his end of the covenant between king and subject. The main complaint was taxation without representation, which was reaffirmed in the early 1606 Charter granted by the king. It was not a revolt over being subject to the king of England, most wanted the protection and benefits provided by the king. Because of the kings refusal to hear their demands and grant relief, separation from England became the lesser of two evils. The cry of freedom and self determination became the rallying cry for the colonist. The slogan "Don't Tread On Me" was the standard borne by the militias. The Revolutionary War was fought and concluded when Cornwallis surrendered to Washington at Yorktown. As Americans we have been taught that we defeated the king and won our freedom. The next document I will use is the Treaty of 1783, which will totally contradict our having won the Revolutionary War. (footnote 2). I want you to notice in the first paragraph that the king refers to himself as prince of the Holy Roman Empire and of the United States. You know from this that the United States did not negotiate this Treaty of peace in a position of strength and victory, but it is obvious that Benjamin Franklin, John Jay and John Adams negotiated a Treaty of further granted privileges from the king of England. Keep this in mind as you study these documents. You also need to understand the players of those that negotiated this Treaty. For the Americans it was Benjamin Franklin Esgr., a great patriot and standard bearer of freedom. Or was he? His title includes Esquire. An Esquire in the above usage was a granted rank and Title of nobility by the king, which is below Knight and above a yeoman, common man. An Esquire is someone that does not do manual labor as signified by this status, see the below definition. "Esquires by virtue of their offices; as justices of the peace, and others who bear any office of trust under the crown....for whosever studieth the laws of the realm, who studieth in the universities, who professeth the liberal sciences, and who can live idly, and without manual labor, and will bear the port, charge, and countenance of a gentleman, he shall be called master, and shall be taken for a gentleman." Blackstone Commentaries p. 561-562 "Esquire - In English Law. A title of dignity next above gentleman, and below knight. Also a title of office given to sheriffs, serjeants, and barristers at law, justices of the peace, and others." Blacks Law Dictionary fourth ed. p. 641 Benjamin Franklin, John Adams and John Jay as you can read in the Treaty were all Esquires and were the signers of this Treaty and the only negotiators of the Treaty. The representative of the king was David Hartley Esqr. Benjamin Franklin was the main negotiator for the terms of the Treaty, he spent most of the War traveling between England and France. The use of Esquire declared his and the others British subjection and loyalty to the crown. In the first article of the Treaty most of the kings claims to America are relinquished, except for his claim to continue receiving gold, silver and copper as gain for his business venture. Article 3 gives Americans the right to fish the waters around the United States and its rivers. In article 4 the United States agreed to pay all bona fide debts. If you will read my other papers on money you will understand that the financiers were working with the king. Why else would he protect their interest with this Treaty? I wonder if you have seen the main and obvious point? This Treaty was signed in 1783, the war was over in 1781. If the United States defeated England, how is the king granting rights to America, when we were now his equal in status? We supposedly defeated him in the Revolutionary War! So why would these supposed patriot Americans sign such a Treaty, when they knew that this would void any sovereignty gained by the Declaration of Independence and the Revolutionary War? If we had won the Revolutionary War, the king granting us our land would not be necessary, it would have been ours by his loss of the Revolutionary War. To not dictate the terms of a peace treaty in a position of strength after winning a war; means the war was never won. Think of other wars we have won, such as when we defeated Japan. Did McArther allow Japan to dictate to him the terms for surrender? No way! All these men did is gain status and privilege granted by the king and insure the subjection of future unawa generations. Worst of all, they sold out those that gave their lives and property for the chance to be free
....TO READ THE REST OF THE CHAPTER, YOU MUST GO HERE FROM THE FOLLOWING SITE "MONTGOMERY" AND THEN READ THE REMAINING 6 CHAPTERS!!
MAKE SURE THAT YOU READ ALL THE OTHER MATERIAL OFFERED BY "MONTGOMERY" AND THE "INFORMER"!
IF YOU WANT TO REALLY GET DEEP INTO IT ALL, YOU NEED TO VISIT THIS SITE TO PURCHASE THE BOOKS THE "INFORMER" HAS WRITTEN. NO, I AM NOT AN AGENT OF THESE GENTLEMEN NOR DO RECEIVE ANY PAYMENT OR COMMISSION FROM THEM FOR ANY SALES OF THE BOOKS, BUY ONLY THE SATISFACTION THAT PEOPLE ARE GETTING INFORMATION THAT IS NEEDED TO HOPEFULLY WAKE THE RIGHT PEOPLE UP SO THAT SOMEHOW WE WILL GET OUR NATION AND CONSTITUTION BACK!! I WOULD NOT KNOW THESE GENTLEMEN IF THEY PAST ME ON A STREET NOR THEY ME.
YOU MAY ALSO WANT TO VISIT THE 'links" PAGE HERE..
Here are a series of 6 presentations, if you like, so that you may listen to all this. They are dated a bit and the sites they mention are not correct and you will be need to use the ones offered above so disregard the ones they speak of!!
Part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shzpr63Q1mA
Part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9igqG0XxdM
Part 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYYlSnSLCpQ
Part 4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGKrByOkMUU
Part 5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bexfHdyrME4
Part 6 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKVicLY99Fw
AGAIN, I AM THE MESSENGER, NOT THE AUTHOR OF ANY OF THIS MATERIAL. I AM NOT THAT SMART, SO IF YOU HAVE ANY GRIPS WITH IT ALL PLEASE POINT YOUR COMMENTS TO THE' "INFORMER" AND JAMES MONTGOMERY. I DO NOT GET ANY BENEFIT PAYMENT OR COMMISSION FROM THEM FOR THIS, ONLY THE PLEASURE OF TELLING FOLKS ABOUT THE ABOUT BS AND CORRUPTION OF WHAT IS GOING ON BEHIND CLOSED DOORS OF OUR "GOVERNMENTS" THAT WE HAVE LOST CONTROL OVER AND THAT WE NEED TO GET CONTROL OF IT SOMEHOW AND WE NEED TO RALLY SOME SMART PEOPLE ACROSS THIS NATION AND WAKE THE SLEEPING SHEEPLE SOON SO THAT WE MAY STOP THE MADNESS FOR OUR CHILDREN'S, GRANDCHILDREN'S AND THEIR FUTURE GENERATIONS SAKE! IF WE DON'T, THEY ARE DOOMED TO A WORLD OF HELL, AND DAMNATION!! I'M NOT BLOWING SMOKE!! WHEN YOU LEARN WHAT I KNOW YOU WILL HAVE MORE URGENCY ABOUT THIS!! SEE THIS BLOG!!
No comments:
Post a Comment